Finally, a distributed circuit model also has clear implications for the nature of neural coding. In such circuits, the role of any given neuron becomes irrelevant, like an atom in a large magnet, since the wider the connectivity matrix, the less importance that each neuron has. Therefore, describing the feature selectivity of a neuron is less informative if the coding becomes an emergent property, based on the multidimensional space generated by the
activity of the entire network. The idea of emergent codes and functional states, such as dynamical attractors, is a cornerstone of the neural network literature (Buonomano, BI 2536 in vitro 2009, Hopfield, 1982, Maass et al., 2002 and Sussillo and Abbott, 2009) and is a major departure from the traditional
view of using receptive field responses of individual cells to characterize the functional properties of a circuit. The structure of the connectivity diagram of mammalian circuits, and how exactly these neurons integrate their inputs, are open and key questions. It is intriguing to think, however, that underlying the apparently daunting functional SAR405838 nmr and structural complexity of neuronal circuits, there could be relatively simple principles that STK38 apply widely. These principles might be obscured by layers of additional mechanisms necessary to keep the circuit operational. I would argue that spines are the anatomical signatures of distributed
neural networks, and that understanding their structure and function might provide us with deep insight into the logic of neural circuits. There could be an underlying simplicity in the design of many brain circuits, and even a lowly Golgi stain, with its spine-laden dendrites and straight axons, might reveal some of these fundamental principles. The author thanks M. Dar for help and L. Abbott, P. Adams, R. Araya, J. DeFelipe, and S. Golob for their comments and was supported by the Kavli Institute for Brain Science and the National Eye Institute. “
“Normal brain activity depends on a continuous supply of oxygen and glucose through cerebral blood flow (CBF). Although cerebral energetic demands are very high, the brain has very little means of energy storage (Attwell and Laughlin, 2001). Therefore, local brain activity has to be matched by a concomitant increase in local CBF—a phenomenon referred to as functional hyperemia or neurovascular coupling. Understanding the mechanisms underlying functional hyperemia is important for several reasons.