In fact, government officials had already conducted BIBW2992 clinical trial an audit of every section of the English coast. They discovered that, in general terms, 66% of the 2748 miles (4400 km) of English coastline already had legally secure paths. They also found that the coastal path that covers 76% of the coastline of the southwestern peninsula of Dorset, Devon, Cornwall and Somerset generates £300 million (US$450 million) a year for the local rural economy. Elsewhere, however, it was concluded that people can only walk an

average of 2 miles (1.6 km) before their path is blocked either by private land or because it is too dangerous ahead. Clearly, despite general approbation for the scheme (with the predictable exception of coastal landowners), it was going to be a very protracted and complex process find more to see it through to fulfillment. And, with all the economic and political woes facing the country in the later part of 2009 and early 2010, the scheme was, perhaps again predictably, allowed to drift from sight or, as a The Sunday Times article of 1 August 2010 (p. 4) put it, ‘tipped into the abyss’. The Sunday Times article reported that the All England Coast Path had been delayed indefinitely ‘in favour of cheaper local improvements’. This was because Natural England’s parent body, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), had to find savings of 50% as a result of the present government’s cost-cutting

exercise. The Path is now no longer considered viable as a consequence and only a 14 mile (22 km) stretch of coast around Weymouth Temsirolimus in vitro (host to the 2012 Olympic sailing events) in Dorset will perhaps go ahead (perhaps, because rights of way will still have to be negotiated with 161 landowners), presumably so that the general public can actually see the otherwise largely

invisible sporting spectacle! The Country Land & Business Association, which represents half of England’s landowners, has said that the scheme has always been misguided and should now be scrapped. I cannot agree with that egocentric view for a number of very clear reasons. Firstly, the Countryside and Rights of Way Act (2000) has not resulted in the general desecration of the countryside by “gangs of feral youths clutching cans of lager and reeking of vomit” as one letter to the editor of The Times asserted (12 June 2008). Secondly, and as noted above, two-thirds of the English coastline is already open to walkers. Thirdly, the government’s audit of England’s coastline showed that the many miles of paths already open to walkers could vanish into the sea in the next 20 years because of coastal erosion. Hence, best to see it now rather than later and create the precedence for future re-alignments. And, as an adjunct to this, one can be absolutely certain that in such a scenario, the same coastal landowners who now so vehemently oppose the scheme will one day be demanding money from the public purse to protect their personal curtilage. Quid pro quo I say.