Where eligibility was not clear, the full text was obtained for more detailed assessment. Studies that clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria were eliminated at this point. Titles of journals, names of authors, or supporting institutions were not masked during the selection process. The inclusion criteria for studies

are presented in Box 1. The exercise therapy program did not need to be carried out by a physiotherapist provided that the program could be regarded as one that a physiotherapist might employ. Trials that were not published in full were excluded. Trials that examined interventions for major complications of fractures such as non-union or delayed union were excluded on the basis that these interventions aimed to treat the fracture itself rather than rehabilitate the individual. Published randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trial Participants who had reached skeletal GSK126 chemical structure maturity Any exercise therapy program Any outcome measure (classified by World Health Organization 2001) Exercise therapy program versus no exercise therapy program/placebo Quality: All included studies were VX-770 manufacturer assessed for quality by two reviewers independently using the PEDro scale.

The PEDro scale has demonstrated moderate levels of inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76) ( Maher et al 2003), and demonstrated evidence of construct reliability in evaluating the methodological quality of clinical trials ( de Morton, 2009). Studies were not excluded on the basis of quality because it was thought that setting a cut-off value to exclude studies of lesser quality could potentially bias the results of the systematic review ( Juni et al 1999). Participants: Age, sex, and type of fracture were recorded to enable comparisons of participants between trials. Intervention: A description of the exercise therapy program (including timing, intensity, frequency, Amisulpride duration, exercises performed, equipment, total time of each session, number of sets and repetitions), the setting in which

the program was performed, and the qualifications of the person administering the intervention were recorded. Outcome measures: Outcome measures that assessed body structure and function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions were examined in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework ( World Health Organisation 2001). This framework defines functioning and disability as a multi-dimensional concept according to body functions (eg, loss of muscular strength) and structures (eg, change to the skeletal system such as a fracture), activities (eg, unable to dress self), and social participation (eg, unable to continue employment). Data analysis: Summary data for each study, including means and standard deviations of the post-intervention group, were extracted independently by two reviewers.