This study tested whether calorie information presented in different formats influenced calories ordered and perceived restaurant healthfulness. Participants in an online survey were randomly assigned to a menu with either (1) no calorie labels (No Calories); (2) calorie labels (Calories); (3) calorie labels ordered from low to high calories (Rank-Ordered Calories); or (4) calorie labels ordered from low to high calories that also had red/green circles indicating higher and lower calorie choices (Colored Calories). Baf-A1 in vivo Participants ordered items for dinner, estimated calories ordered, and rated restaurant healthfulness. Participants
in the Rank-Ordered Calories condition and those in the Colored Calories condition ordered fewer calories than the No Calories group. There was no significant difference in calories ordered between the Calories and No Calories groups. Participants in each calorie label condition were significantly more accurate in estimating calories ordered compared to the No Calories group. Those in the Colored Calories group perceived the restaurant as healthier. The results suggest that presenting calorie information in the modified Rank-Ordered or Colored Calories formats may increase menu labeling effectiveness. (C) 2012 Elsevier Rabusertib manufacturer Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Objectives:
To study the use of intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) in diagnosing gut dysfunction in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).\n\nMethods: Thirty-two patients with AP onset within 7 days were enrolled in our study. The severity of disease and the gut dysfunction were evaluated as follows: on admission, on the seventh day of disease attack, and on the third day after enteral nutrition. Serum levels of I-FABP,
citrulline, and C-reactive Y-27632 purchase protein (CRP) and the lactulose and mannitol absorption ratio in urine were measured in parallel.\n\nResults: The serum level of I-FABP increased on admission, and it was more pronounced in severe attacks. All patients had increased gut dysfunction score, serum level of CRP, and urine level of lactulose and mannitol absorption ratio with decreased serum level of citrulline. A positive correlation was found between the following pairs of measurement on admission: serum level of I-FABP and gut dysfunction score, serum level of I-FABP and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, I-FABP and serum level of CRP, and serum level of I-FABP and the length of ICU stay. A reverse correlation between the serum level of I-FABP and the serum level of citrulline was found.\n\nConclusions: The serum level of I-FABP can be used for assessing the gut dysfunction and disease severity of AP.”
“Current laboratory methods used to passage adherent human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are labor intensive, result in reduced cell viability and are incompatible with larger scale production necessary for many clinical applications.