Our task is fundamentally different from the opt-out tasks used in both prior studies. A monkey had to make a decision and then place a bet on the correctness

of that decision (Figure 1A). Appropriate wagers required retrospective monitoring, a metacognitive process. Every trial contained the same sequence of task events, and every trial required the monitoring of decisions, allowing us to directly compare activity between trials to identify neuronal correlates of decision-making, wagering, and monitoring. We recorded from neurons in three frontal areas: the frontal eye field (FEF), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), and supplementary eye field (SEF). Each area has neuronal activity related to vision, saccades, and reward (Boch and Goldberg, 1989; Bruce and Goldberg, 1985; Ding and Hikosaka, 2006; Funahashi et al., 1991; Kim et al., 2008; Mohler et al., 1973; Roesch and Olson, 2003; Russo http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Trichostatin-A.html and Bruce, 1996; Stuphorn et al., 2000; Watanabe, 1996). FEF and PFC contain neurons involved in decision making (Kim and Shadlen, 1999), target selection (Schall et al., 1995), attention (Iba and Sawaguchi, 2003; Thompson and Bichot, 2005), and maintaining information during a delay (Funahashi et al., 1989; Kim et al., mTOR inhibitor 2008; Sommer and Wurtz, 2001). FEF neurons, in particular, predict upcoming decisions in a reverse-masking

task (Thompson and Schall, 1999) that inspired the Rolziracetam decision-making portion of our task. PFC neurons have been implicated in a range of high-level cognitive processes, including executive function (Miller and Cohen, 2001), abstract rule encoding (Wallis

and Miller, 2003), and behavioral context (Johnston and Everling, 2006), suggesting that they collectively function to guide behavior for a desired outcome (Tanji and Hoshi, 2008). SEF neurons have been implicated in performance monitoring by signaling error, conflict, and reward (Nakamura et al., 2005; Stuphorn et al., 2000). Given these different characteristics, we predicted that FEF neurons would be more “low level” in encoding the decision alone, whereas PFC and SEF would be more “high level” in linking the decision to the appropriate bet. We analyzed neuronal activity from FEF, PFC, and SEF with respect to three main functions of the task: making decisions, placing bets, and linking decisions to appropriate bets. Activity in all three areas correlated with decisions and likewise with bets, but only activity in the SEF correlated with monitoring decisions to guide bets. Of the three areas, the SEF seems the most involved in metacognition. We previously provided a detailed analysis of the monkeys’ behaviors during sessions prior to neuronal recordings (Middlebrooks and Sommer, 2011). Here, we analyze behavioral data collected during the recording sessions of the present study (150 sessions for Monkey N, 182 for Monkey S).