It has been shown that administration of sub-therapeutic levels can interfere with DNA replication (e.g. quinolones) [59, 60], folic acid synthesis (e.g. trimethoprim) [61], protein synthesis (e.g. tetracycline) [62] as well as cell wall synthesis (e.g. β-lactams) [63] and may induce the so-called SOS response [64] which can promote acquisition and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes [57, 65]. Thus, our results reinforce the need for great caution in the use of selleck chemicals llc SOS-inducing antibiotics to avoid induction of resistance transfer following antibiotic therapy.

It is known that the LexA protein as part of the SOS response binds to the LexA box preceding the intI gene and thereby increasing the transcription Adriamycin nmr rate of the intI gene resulting in an increased gene cassette exchange rate in the integron see more [66]. There is no recognized LexA box found close to the promoters of the traD, virB11 and virD4 genes of the pRAS1 plasmid sequence (data not shown). However, the occurrence of LexA targets in promoter sequence areas in vivo without the existence of a putative LexA box in the DNA sequence has been demonstrated. This indicates the assistance by an additional unknown factor in regulation of LexA gene expression in vivo [67]. An equally remarkable finding was the impact

of antibiotic treatments on the expression of innate immunity genes. The decreased TNF α and C3 expression in the zebrafish’s intestine after non-effective tetracycline treatment is in accordance with earlier reports [68, 69] relating tetracyclines to posttranscriptional blockage of cytokine production [70]. Whereas, Selleckchem Erastin sulphonamide and trimethoprim treatments that have no impact on the growth of pathogenic A. hydrophila had little impact on IL-1β and IL-8, as expected. In contrast, the sub-inhibitory level of flumequine caused 40 and 20 fold increases in the expressions of IL-1β and IL-8, respectively.

In addition effective flumequine treatment caused 200 and 100 times higher expressions of those genes, respectively. Hypothetically, this may be related to the immunomodulatory properties of those drugs [71, 72] and in the diminished number (killed) of pathogenic A. hydrophila that can no longer depress the immune system by its virulence factors when the effective flumequine treatment was employed [73, 74]. We have for the first time termed this clear, aggressive, immunological activity at the molecular level as ‘Charged Immune Attack, (CIA)’, which describes the inevitably strong revenge of the innate immune response against the weakened bacterial infection, as mediated by a short period with an effective antimicrobial treatment. The reason for this bias is not known, but both human and veterinary medical practitioners have observed that a single dose of antibiotics, sometimes surprisingly, may cure an infection.