In Figure 3, we present the XRD patterns exhibited by the ZnO NWs and NWLs. These XRD patterns suggest that both NWs and NWLs are highly crystalline PU-H71 molecular weight wurtzite ZnO. Indeed, the 2θ peaks appearing at 34.42° and 72.5° MM-102 manufacturer correspond to the [0002] and [0004] directions, consistent with a growth along the c-axis of hexagonal ZnO. Moreover, the excellent material crystallinity, found by the XRD measurements, suggests that the present nanomaterials are potentially valuable for high-performance ZnO-based nanosensor

and nanoactuator applications. The other peaks appearing at 35.7°, 75.6°, and 38.18° in Figure 3 correspond to single crystalline [0002] and [0004] directions of the SiC substrate and the Au (111) catalyst, respectively. To confirm these results, HRTEM analysis were also carried out on individual ZnO NWs. A representative HRTEM image can be found in Figure 4. First, the electron diffraction pattern of the ZnO NW confirms the high crystallinity of the material. Moreover, the distance between adjacent planes (lattice fringes) along the NW length was measured to be 0.26 nm,

consistent with that of (0001) wurtzite ZnO phase. Figure 3 XRD patterns of ZnO nanowalls and nanowires. Figure 4 HRTEM image of ZnO NW including the selected area diffraction pattern as inset. As mentioned previously, in the VLS process, the location of metal catalyst after the growth is essential for the determination of the growth process. To determine the exact position Etomidate of the Au nanoparticles, EDX experiments were carried out on both NWs and NWLs. Figure 5 shows an example of high-magnification cross-section STEM image of EPZ004777 mw ZnO NWLs and the area scan used for the EDX analysis. From this figure, it can be seen that the Au nanoparticles are located close to the ZnO-SiC interface. The presence of Au nanoparticle at

the ZnO/substrate interface is well documented in the literature [10, 15–17, 21]. However, the exact mechanism responsible for the growth process of such diverse nanostructures is not fully understood. The observation of the Au seed particle at the ZnO/substrate interface would suggest that the growth of the nanostructures is due to the non-catalytic-assisted VLS. However, we will show in later sections that the apparent location of the Au seed particles can also be due to a combination of catalytic-assisted and non-catalytic-assisted VLS processes [15]. Figure 5 High-magnification STEM image of ZnO NWLs and the area scanned for EDX analysis. To gain a better understanding of the growth processes/mechanisms responsible for the formation of the various ZnO nanostructures, the early stages of material synthesis are crucial. Hence, as presented in Figure 6, we have examined nanostructure growth processes varying the main synthesis parameters, i.e., Au layer thicknesses and temperature, keeping all the other parameters, such as time (10 min), constant.