In all CR patients after eradication treatment, the TLA finding had disappeared (100%); XL184 chemical structure however, in the non-CR patients, TLA remained the same as before the eradication therapy (p = 0.002). Conclusion: These results suggest that NBI magnifying endoscopy may be useful not only in the diagnosis but also in the evaluation of response to eradication therapy of MALT lymphoma of the stomach. Key Word(s): 1. NBI; 2. malt Presenting Author: KOUICHI NONAKA Additional Authors: KEN OHATA, MAIKO TAKITA, YASUSHI MATSUYAMA, TOMOAKI TASHIMA, YOHEI MINATO, NOBUYUKI MATSUHASHI Corresponding Author: KOUICHI NONAKA Affiliations: Ntt Medical Center Tokyo, Ntt Medical Center

Tokyo, Ntt Medical Center Tokyo, Ntt Medical Center Tokyo, Ntt Medical Center Tokyo, Ntt Medical Center Tokyo Objective: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a new imaging modality that enables the in vivo histological RXDX-106 solubility dmso evaluation of gastrointestinal mucosa during ongoing endoscopy. As confocal imaging is possible by fluorescein of the tissue, fluorescein contrast is necessary for pCLE. Fluorescein is intravenously administered. The side effects of fluorescein include yellow-colored urine, nausea, and exanthema. However, these symptoms resolve over time. Other severe adverse effects are extremely rare. However, some studies indicated that the intravenous administration of fluorescein caused shock or arterial ischaemia. To promote the widespread application of pCLE,

an alternative method in which pCLE can be more safely performed compared

to the intravenous administration of fluorescein should be developed. We successfully obtained selleck compound an image quality similar to that on intravenous administration by dripping fluorescein in the duodenal mucosa, and not by intravenous administration, and reported it as a first in the world (Digestive Endoscopy, 2014). Methods: In 3 subjects, crystal violet, indigo carmine, Lugol’s iodine, and 10% fluorescein were dripped on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa (esophagus, gastric body, and duodenum) in this order. Finally, 2.5 mL of 10% fluorescein was intravenously injected, and the image with this was used as a control. Results: In the stomach and duodenum, images could be acquired only with the dripping and intravenous injection of fluorescein in all subjects, and the images were favorable for histological evaluation. In the esophagus, images could also be acquired only with the dripping and intravenous injection of fluorescein, but the images were insufficient to evaluate the histology. Conclusion: Confocal laser endomicroscopy was suggested to be inappropriate for histological evaluation of the esophageal mucosa. For the stomach and duodenum, it was suggested that dripping a very small amount of fluorescein is an alternative to intravenous administration, being a clue to promoting the widespread of confocal laser endomicroscopy. We also report on the preparation and skills for the fluorescein dripping method. Key Word(s): 1.