for providing the data and making MyFLq easily accessible on their BaseSpace platform. “
“This article has been published in Forensic Science International Volume 7, Issues 5, e8–e12, April 2012. However, this article was submitted as part of DNA in Forensics 2012 special issue and should have been published as such in this issue (Volume 7, Issues 6, 2013). The article can be located at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.06.003. INCB018424 order The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. “
“In the Abstract of the article “Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes in Endodontic Microsurgery: A Retrospective Study” (J Endod 2011;37:927–33),

under “Results,” in the second and third

sentences, “root-filling length (adequate)” should be changed to “root-filling length (inadequate).” The correct sentences now read, “At the 0.05 level of significance, age, sex (female), tooth position (anterior), root-filling length (inadequate), lesion type (endodontic lesion), root-end filling material (mineral trioxide aggregate and Super EBA; Harry J. Bosworth, Skokie, IL), and restoration at follow-up appeared to have a positive effect on the outcome. On the other hand, with an isolated endodontic lesion, the tooth position (anterior), root-filling length (inadequate), and restoration at follow-up were significant

almost factors at the 95% confidence level. On page selleck kinase inhibitor 931, 7th line of the 4th full paragraph in the right hand column, “root-filling length (adequate)” should be changed to “root-filling length (inadequate). “
“In the article “Numeric Comparison of the Static Mechanical Behavior between ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files” (J Endod 2011;37:1158–61), the results shown for the torsion case are for a torque of 1.25 Nmm instead of the 2.5 Nmm mentioned. Note that this does not affect, in any way, the discussion or the conclusions regarding the comparison between the rotary instruments’ performance. “
“The creation of new DNA profiling technologies and their application to forensic science is key to the field’s development. Improvements to the speed, sensitivity and power of discrimination are all common areas of research [1], [2] and [3]. Recently there have been moves towards the development of technologies focussing on automation and portability which, together with cost reduction, will usher in the next generation of forensic platforms [4]. Rapid DNA profiling is one such area of research and development and has been growing in response to a desire from enforcement authorities for both in-house control over the forensic DNA process and rapid access to forensic genetic intelligence [5].