By incorporating aboriginal land use practices into the active management of remaining Garry oak ecosystems, restoration or intervention activities (Hobbs et al. 2011) may be more successful

than they are at present (Dunwiddie and Bakker 2011; Götmark 2013). Even with active management, ecological intervention will be necessary to maintain mixed age class Garry oak ecosystems over the next century—especially in Canada. Given that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Pachauri and Reisinger 2007) has concluded that Earth’s climate is very likely changing at a pace unprecedented in the CDK inhibitors in clinical trials last 10,000 years, this leads us to wonder how we can best protect the value of our lands and renewable resources for both ourselves

and for future generations? It is crucial for palaeoecologists to tackle issues associated with conservation ecology (Froyd and Willis 2008). In particular, paleoecology can contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between climate and ecosystem response in the context of natural range of variability and ecological thresholds. Given that most of the available literature on ecosystems is focused on timescales less than 50 years, palaeoecological studies focusing on longer time horizons and ecological questions are useful (Froyd and Willis 2008). This is especially important in future conservation efforts as novel ecosystems may become the norm given climate change (Williams et al. 2007; Hobbs check details et al. 2009). Strategic site selection for Garry oak ecosystems Montelukast Sodium under future climate scenarios (Pellatt et al. 2012) will likely involve the alteration of future ecosystems in order to maintain many of the ecosystems that we value today. Hence lessons learned from the past regarding Garry oak ecosystem structure and function, aboriginal land use, and fire show us that many Garry oak associated ecosystems

are eco-cultural in origin. We also can see from the conditions of these ecosystems today and where they may persist in the future, that ecological intervention activities may be necessary for their persistence and even with our active management activities, these systems will be different than they were in the past. Just as importantly we seek to stress the need to accept and incorporate traditional land-use practices into ecosystem management activities because our study area was not terra nullius (Lindqvist 2007); it was the result of an eco-cultural interaction. Understanding ecological see more processes (past and possible futures) is critical in determining the feasibility of long-term recovery or future ecological trajectories (Karlsson et al. 2007). If we fail to understand, and in many cases emulate, these processes then we will become gardeners, maintaining fragments of a past ecosystem that represents a depauperate assemblage of its former richness.