5 46 6 0.652

0.664 1.3377 Cmm-V9 1-3 20 3 0.577 0.588 0.932 Cmm-V13 1-3 35 3 0.534 0.544 0.8225 Cmm-V2 2-5 45 3 0.53 0.54 0.844 Cmm-V26 1-2 33 2 0.494 0.503 0.677 Cmm-V15 3-5 34 3 0.417 0.425 0.7334 Cmm-V16 2-6.5 47 5 0.392 0.399 0.8864 Cmm-V22 1-3 26 2 0.504 0.514 0.5811 Diversity Index (for VNTR data) = A measure of the variation of the number of repeats at each locus. Ranges from 0.0 (no diversity) to 1.0 (complete diversity). aCalculated by V-DICE (http://​www.​hpa-bioinformatics.​org.​uk/​cgi-bin/​DICI/​DICI.​pl). Selleckchem Omipalisib bCalculated in BioNumerics v 5.1. VNTR PCR amplification and sequencing The PCR mixture had a total volume of 25 μl, containing 1 x PCR buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl [pH 8.3]) (Qiagen), dNTP’s 0.2 mM each, 0.6 μM of each primer, 0.5 U DNA Taq polymerase, and 50–60 ng template DNA. The PCR amplifications were performed under following conditions: 3 min denaturation step at 94˚C; 35 cycles of 94˚C for 1 min, annealing at 60˚C for 1 min, and extention at 72˚C for 1 min; and a final extension step at SP600125 supplier 72˚C for 10 min. Amplified products were run on a 2.5% Gel Pilot® Small Fragment Agarose (Qiagen) at 110 V for 2.5 hrs at 4°C using 25 bp size marker (Invitrogen), and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.

PCR amplicons from one representative strain per different locus of a particular VNTR were sequenced using sequencing primers (Table 2) according to the sequencing protocol described above for gyrB and dnaA genes. VNTR analysis and statistics Product sizes were estimated and the exact number of repeats present was calculated using a derived allele-naming table, based on the number of repeats

which could theoretically be present in a PCR product of a given size, allowing for extra flanking nucleotides and primer size. Theoretical number of repeats was confirmed subsequently by sequencing. Loci were named simply on the basis of the order in which they were found by the initial search. VNTR allele calls were analyzed in BioNumerics as ‘character’ data. Composite datasets were created for the eight Clav-VNTR loci. Distance trees were derived by clustering with the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA), using ‘categorical’ character table values. Y-27632 2HCl All markers were given equal weight, irrespective of the number of repeats. The percentages in the dendrogram reflect the percentage of homology between the specific markers. Relatedness between the different haplotypes was investigated based on comparison of allelic profiles using the minimum spanning tree (MST) method from BioNumerics v 5.1. We used the classical criterium of one allelic mismatch to group haplotypes into clonal complexes. In order to assess the evolutionary relatedness between haplotypes the MLVA data was analyzed taking into account the number of repeat differences.