, 2011) creates small patches of trees when individuals farming small parcels allow natural regeneration on a portion of their land. Because total farm check details size is often less than 5 ha, the wooded portion is probably too small to be classified as a forest stand under prevailing definitions. Nevertheless, in addition to providing fuelwood,

construction material, and possibly fodder, this woody patch could provide seeds for colonizing the surrounding area if farming were to be abandoned. A dispersed design was attempted in early implementation of the Wetlands Reserve Program, a government-funded program, in the southern USA (Stanturf et al., 2000 and Stanturf et al., 2001), where an objective was to enhance wildlife habitat by outplanting hard mast species. Large-seeded Quercus species are not readily dispersed so they were

outplanted on wide spacing and light-seeded species were expected to fill-in and create closed-canopy stands ( Fig. 6a). This approach was successful only where intact natural stands were nearby ( Fig. 10a), generally within 100 m ( Stanturf et al., 2001, Stanturf et al., 2009 and Nuttle and Haefner, 2005). Cluster afforestation (Schönenberger, 2001, Díaz-Rodríguez et al., 2012 and Saha et al., 2012) is similar to nucleation in that plantings are scattered on the landscape (Fig. 10d). The distinction is that clusters are small stands, as opposed to a few trees. Clusters may be comprised of simple or find more complex plantings. Corridors between intact forest stands for wildlife dispersal (Newmark, 1993, Mann and Plummer, 1995 and Kindlmann and Burel, 2008) or riparian buffer strips along waterways to reduce farm runoff (Schultz et al., 1995, Mize et al., 2008 and Bentrup et al., 2012) are examples of linear clusters (Fig. 11a and

b). Clusters may provide Etomidate seeds that can be dispersed longer distances and passively expand if surrounding land uses allow (e.g., Balandier et al., 2005). This is evident in the northeastern USA where native forests were extensively cleared for agriculture but small farm woodlots were maintained to serve farmers’ needs. When farmland was abandoned during the 1920s and 1930s, these woodlots were the nucleus for the secondary forests that developed (e.g., Raup, 1966, Moore and Witham, 1996 and Flinn et al., 2005). Rehabilitation of forest stands with intact partial or complete overstory may require some site preparation, control of competing vegetation, and/or enhancement of light conditions by removal or reduction of overstory or midstory plants (Wagner and Lundqvist, 2005). Appropriate methods depend upon light conditions and the light requirements of the species to be restored. Natural regeneration may provide sufficient plants of desirable species or assisted regeneration may be necessary. Some stands may be sufficiently opened by previous thinning or other disturbances to plant or sow mid to low shade-tolerant species without further overstory reduction (Fig. 12a).